Walker is facing a two-year, $3 billion budget shortfall. I'm in the US (so this comment is US-centric). Are these regressions characterized by systematic patterns in the sequencing of rights violations? Especially in local and state elections, where my vote (given the smaller size of electorates in such elections) is more consequential. Some people go to school to learn some things about human behavior and cognition, and then get jobs hypothesizing about the causal underpinnings of human behavior, and then broadcast these hypotheses to the world from where they are picked up and stored in other minds, which then also proceed to hypothesize about other things based on the aggregate of information (of which this is only a small part) they have consumed in the past.

5.

Political leadership grows from below. TAKING DECISION BASED ON THE REGRESSION MODEL USING EXCEL 2016, Estimating biomass from body size of European spiders based on regression models, "How to Interpret Regression Coefficients and Calculate Adjustments for Differences in Property Productivity Features", Regression by Partitioning Feature Projections, Regression Coefficient of Neutralization Indices, Regression Estimation of Event Probabilities.

For a certain period (when the lifestyle was actually militarily superior) roaming worked well for steppe peoples. I think CSPAN is the best source for anything government related on the national front. So what if they leave? > Only the profoundly ignorant are supporting these wannabe autocrats. The torture scandals of Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo Bay also have not helped.

Even better when you can demonize the countries whose governments are of the opposite ideological strain than that of the donors. The last two presidents elected by a minority of the vote have been an unmitigated disaster for America. But this type of language and thinking is incredibly common right here on HN, a place we consider to be a place of quality discussion. clumsy terms like cancel culture and wokeness try to describe/mock this sort of tribalism, but the underlying impetuses those terms describe is a significant contributor to division as well. Overall, the conclusions of the study merit skepticism given the arbitrariness of democratic scoring. If you’re lumping in economic change with social change, I think that’s broadly true. 58 Studies of political polarization make And we have to reform the Supreme Court... term limits, a rotating bench, something. I mean ethical/fair.

Finally, ALL of the above is completely neutral to "conservative" or "progressive" politics. There's a non-benedictine abbey near me which celebrated its 1'500th birthday a while ago, and at least a handful of benedictine which are probably not many centuries younger. I can tell from a fairly informed perspective that the quality of the process of voting in elections in India over the past decade has gone up significantly due to tamper-proof EVMs and the fact that India's voting commission is an independent constitutional body. Some white working class women outside metros now say, enough Trump!

The country narratives are not available for 2019 or 2020.

"Political Limitations of Psychological Warfare."

taibbi and thomas frank's writings on this subject have been very good. I think it's more that it's easier to agree on things as a conservative. To quote Charlie Munger, incentives matter and to quote Taleb - always always ask what they are selling.

This is why most people don't vote. I guess it sort of makes sense that it appears much of the homelessness in Canada clusters around Vancouver since it is far more mild than the Eastern portion of the country. You then bring up that somehow, measurement of liberties would have a scientific basis? TIL Benedictines are more Marxist than Marx. Just tap > The intent was to create a republic, not a democracy.

Oddly, Linebarger (a professional propagandist who, to my knowledge, went 1-1, winning WWII and losing China) claims good propaganda is the opposite: I mean, if we're talking about the Eastern Front, the basic necessities of life were a lot more stark there than they are in 21st century America, right? I'm just pointing out how they dominate the political discourse and prevent other issues from being debated. Autocracy Masquerading as Democracy: The Regression of the United States and Hungary to Non-Democratic States. to be fair both wars were started in europe. The things people talk about and get emotional about are the things that sway elections, and therefore these are the topics politicians focus on. Perhaps those showing favoritism haven't realized that in the bigger picture, although favoritism is convenient, it undermines the whole system in the long run. Poppycock. Perhaps throw in a reform of security agencies that have been misused to interfere in domestic elections. > When you put it before the voters as America's relevance to the international order versus their houses, jobs, and communities, they're gonna choose the latter. State-level voting reform, including universal and automatic mail-in ballots, and ranked choice voting. Thing is, in our constitution only the president can issue lockdown, and only after being reviewed by three different oversight groups, because we had a nasty dicatorship during cold war, our new constituion was written deliberately to make really hard to create a new dictatorship, yet our supreme court is happily ignoring a lot of parts of our constitution to give the government dicatorship powers, and the president is opposing it, but every time he does so, people say he, is the dictator. For sure, things are better here than most other places, but it is still chock full of objectively incorrect statements and erroneous thinking, much of it being very nuanced and easily dismissed by "don't be pedantic", "you know what I meant", etc. But logically doesn't line up.

Psychology Reversion to an earlier or less mature pattern... Regression - definition of regression by The Free Dictionary. A quote from 2016 that I heard agrees with your thesis: "I can't throw a Molotov cocktail through the window of the White House, but I can throw a Donald Trump." Americans’ Revulsion for Trump Is Underappreciated.

Generally manufacturing are moved out of US which could cause a bigger wealth gap between the the rich and working class. Thanks! This is a phase of globalization. But I suppose, if I were around at the nation's founding, I would have been a Federalist. Many feel that policy is easier to grasp than tech algorithms so they feel the solutions are obvious. Also, I think many studies on inequality assume things like stocks are all worth face value, which is optimistic to say the least.

In hindsight, he regrets getting mixed up in it, yet admits he'd had the dopamine hit at the time.). So an African leader could enslave his people instead of a European one?

Through our imprint ECPR Press and via the OUP Comparative Politics book series, we publish research by, and for the political science community.

And what's driving the Republican party right now is echo chamber insanity. I wonder how long it’ll take for people to realize that. Posts prior to yours have stated other causes (lack of leadership, economic issues). Incentives matter and always always ask what they are selling and why.

It's so easy to rationalize as "being informed". See more.

I guess my question relates more to the idea that the US has a “business friendly” economic regime and any change to that status quo is going to cause the very rich to leave. For more similarities to open source schisms, consider https://blog.ayjay.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/BenOp-788x... and replace the christian references with geeky projects such as "building a modern operating system", "immanentising the crypto eschaton", "welcoming our new GPT-N overlords", etc. If you can fix a bunch of small things, it can still make a big difference. Freedom house is selling their rankings to Donors. Also it makes sense that both major US parties are mostly filled with wealthy people, so if they can keep "the poors" fighting about orthogonal issues, the two parties can stay in power. Because otherwise the whole gang would break up. Yes, you're absolutely correct, and I got it backwards. The way we manage and discuss affairs on planet earth however, is almost entirely operated in this non-scientific, error-riddled form.

But it will eventually pass, and the world will not be much worse for the wear.

The government can print or redistributed as much money as they want. There are several schools of philosophy that assert that selfishness is the highest moral standard.

This is why most people don't vote. Look at the talk given by Yuri Bezmenov, this type of thing has been ongoing for a very long time.

The Democratic Party and the left continue to think Trump's victory was about race, and I still think they are wrong.

Ugh.

An engaging platform for discussion, debate and thinking; Europe's largest annual gathering of political scientists from across the globe. https://www.thefreedictionary.com/regression. Obama had clearly demonstrated himself to be Bush's third term, at least when it comes to quite a few issues such as banking reform and remaining entangled in Iraq. I deny that it is a flaw. Then we're a few steps away from global political parties and then global government. (Incoming Republican Governor Nathan Deal is expected to embrace the report.) Sorry, if this is out of context for the main topic, but these keep bugging me. I don’t think we’ll — I hope we don’t need them in terms of the election itself. This unique event has helped tens of thousands of scholars over nearly five decades hone research, grow networks and secure publishing contracts. I _don't_ think merely questioning the electoral college counts as suspicion of democracy itself.