Here's why 401,000 law students have relied on our case briefs: Are you a current student of ? United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. When Barbara Grutter (Plaintiff), a white Michigan resident with a 3.8 grade average and 161 LSAT score, was denied admission to the University of Michigan Law School (Defendant), she sued the latter in federal district court, alleging racial discrimination against her in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment on the basis of the law school’s (Defendant) direct consideration of race as a factor in the admissions process The University of Michigan (UM), a state school, gave black and Latino admission applicants preference in admissions decisions. The petitioners claimed that the case threatened their access to public education and that UM could not adequately represent their interest in the case's outcome. You can try any plan risk-free for 7 days. Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee. Become a member and get unlimited access to our massive library of The operation could not be completed. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. 02-241 Argued: April 1, 2003 Decided: June 23, 2003. The procedural disposition (e.g. Grutter v. Bollinger is an important milestone in the debate on affirmative action. Cancel anytime.

The federal district court denied the petition, ruling that UM could adequately represent the petitioners' interest. Get Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. UM denied admission to Barbara Grutter and Jennifer Gratz (plaintiffs), both of whom were white admission applicants. Then click here. The holding and reasoning section includes: v1479 - b705b5e02d782e2236ca32952d2cf20f3c046f31 - 2020-09-25T12:14:31Z. Several black and Latino admission applicants, prospective applicants, and groups (petitioners) filed a timely Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2) petition to intervene in the case. The University of Michigan Law School (Law School), one of the Nation's top law schools, follows an official admissions policy that seeks to achieve student body diversity through compliance with Regents of Univ. You can try any plan risk-free for 30 days. The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section; A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and. The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. Grutter and Gratz sued Lee Bollinger (defendant), a UM admissions officer, for violating their Fourteenth Amendment equal-protection rights. Read more about Quimbee. The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. Quimbee might not work properly for you until you.

GRUTTER v. BOLLINGER et al. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. United States Supreme Court. (2003) No. You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. of Cal. No contracts or commitments. A summary and case brief of Grutter v. Bollinger, 188 F.3d 394 (1999), including the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, key terms, and concurrences and dissents. If you logged out from your Quimbee account, please login and try again. The intervenors appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. practice questions in 1L, 2L, & 3L subjects, as well as 16,500+ case law school study materials, including 726 video lessons and 5,100+

Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.

No contracts or commitments. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings, or use a different web browser like Google Chrome or Safari. Read our student testimonials. The Supreme Court held that the Constitution supported "the law school's narrowly tailored use of race in admissions decisions to further a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body." This case was decided in 2003. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. v.Bakke, 438 U. S. 265. You're using an unsupported browser. Cancel anytime. ). Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. briefs keyed to 223 law school casebooks.

This website requires JavaScript. If not, you may need to refresh the page. Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), was a landmark case of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning affirmative action in student admissions.