Grutter v. Bollinger. 01-1447 and 01-1516 (CA6), p. 7336). CaseBriefSummary.comCopyright © 2013 | All Rights Reserved, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius. 01—1447 and 01—1516 (CA6), p. 7336). Statement of the Facts: Each year, the University of Michigan Law School receives approximately 3500 applications for 350 available seats. She presumably wrote this to suggest that affirmative action policies ought to be temporary because society will advance to a phase of non-discrimination on its own.
To justify its policy the law school stated that they had a compelling interest to achieve diversity within the school. Grutter v. Bollinger Case Brief - Rule of Law: Diversity is a compelling interest that can justify the narrowly tailored use of race when public universities. Petitioner argued that the school had granted admissions to minorities with similar or lesser credentials than she. Brief for Respondent Bollinger et al. Petitioner applied to the University of Michigan Law School with a 3.8 GPA and LSAT score of 161 and was denied admission. Petitioner argued that the school had granted admissions to minorities with similar or lesser credentials than she. The law school had an outwardly stated policy of admitting students on the basis of race. She wrote that at an unspecified time in the future, the use of race in admissions will no longer be necessary.

Brief for Respondent Bollinger et al. Justice O’Connor wrote that the policy was narrowly tailored enough to withstand strict scrutiny and that the university had a compelling interest to achieve racial diversity up to a particular point. Whether the admission policy on the basis of race violates the equal protection clause such that it does not promote a compelling interest. 43, n. 70 (citing App. Petitioner applied to the University of Michigan Law School with a 3.8 GPA and LSAT score of 161 and was denied admission. Grutter v. Bollinger Case Brief. Grutter v. Bollinger. Whether the admission policy on the basis of race violates the equal protection clause such that it does not promote a compelling interest. Facts. Petitioner applied to the University of Michigan Law School with a 3.8 GPA and LSAT score of 161 and was denied admission. No, policy upheld. Home » » Case Briefs » Constitutional Law » Grutter v. Bollinger. This case and its companion, Gratz v. Bollinger, challenged the affirmative action admissions practices of the University of Michigan's law school and undergraduate programs, respectively. The court wrote that they took the university’s word that race was never the sole reason for acceptance of rejection, but rather a meaningful consideration alongside other meaningful considerations. Grutter applied with a 3.8 undergraduate GPA and an LSAT score of 161.

The law school had an outwardly stated policy of admitting students on the basis of race. In 1997, Barbara Grutter, a white resident of Michigan, applied for admission to the University of Michigan Law School.

43, n. 70 (citing App. At trial the court held that the policy was not justified because such discrimination does not present a compelling interest to discriminate on the basis of race. CaseBriefSummary.comCopyright © 2013 | All Rights Reserved, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius. 01-1447 and 01-1516 (CA6), p. 7336). Gratz v. Bollinger Case Brief. She presumably wrote this to suggest that affirmative action policies ought to be temporary because society will advance to a phase of non-discrimination on its own. in Nos. in Nos. The two cases were filed in 1997 by white plaintiffs who alleged that the University's use of race violated their constitutional right to equal protection of the laws. GRUTTER V. BOLLINGER (02-241) 539 U.S. 306 (2003) 288 F.3d 732, affirmed. She wrote that at an unspecified time in the future, the use of race in admissions will no longer be necessary.

Statement of the facts: After being denied entry into the University of Michigan’s undergraduate College of Literature, Science, and the Arts, Gratz and Hamacher, two Caucasians, filed suit against one of the University’s advisors in federal district court. Justice O’Connor wrote that the policy was narrowly tailored enough to withstand strict scrutiny and that the university had a compelling interest to achieve racial diversity up to a particular point. Facts. Home » » Case Briefs » Constitutional Law » Grutter v. Bollinger. Every Bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below: PLUS: Hundreds of law school topic-related videos from Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the University of Michigan undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy.

The Law School admits that it uses race as a factor in making admissions decisions because it serves a \"compelling interest in achieving diversity among its student body.\" The District Court concluded that the Law School's stated interest in achieving diversity in the student body was not a com… The court wrote that they took the university’s word that race was never the sole reason for acceptance of rejection, but rather a meaningful consideration alongside other meaningful considerations. No, policy upheld. Get Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. in Nos. To justify its policy the law school stated that they had a compelling interest to achieve diversity within the school. A summary and case brief of Grutter v. Bollinger, 188 F.3d 394 (1999), including the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, key terms, and concurrences and dissents. Brief for Respondents Bollinger et al.
43, n. 70 (citing App. The Law School strived to admit a diverse student body in selecting those 350 students. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. The law school had an outwardly stated policy of admitting students on the basis of race. She was denied admission. Posted on November 6, 2012 | Constitutional Law | Tags: Constitutional Law Case Brief. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit heard this case the same day as Grutter v. Bollinger , a similar case, and upheld the University’s admission policies in that case. At trial the court held that the policy was not justified because such discrimination does not present a compelling interest to discriminate on the basis of race. Posted on November 6, 2012 | Constitutional Law | Tags: Constitutional Law Case Brief. The petitioners in this case then asked the Court to grant certiorari, despite the lack of opinion from the lower court, to resolve the issue. Moreover, as JUSTICE KENNEDY concedes, see post , at 390, between 1993 and 1998, the number of African-American, Latino, and Native-American students in each class at the Law School varied from 13.5 to 20.1 percent, a range inconsistent with a quota. Petitioner applied to the University of Michigan Law School with a 3.8 GPA and LSAT score of 161 and was denied admission.