Model C fiscal sponsorships, where a public charity enters into a pre-approved grant relationship with an unrelated individual or organization, may be less common than Model A direct-program sponsorships, but they do offer some advantages, including the possibility of limiting a sponsor’s liability for project activities. 1 0 obj <> endobj The project involves the work(s) of a single artist or collaborative group. But the health of the sponsor and the structure of the fiscal sponsorship agreement are critical to ensuring that your grants are made appropriately and in compliance with applicable laws. Fiscal sponsorship describes a number of varying contractual relationships that have through custom and practice developed between “sponsors” and “projects,” making it possible for charitable projects to receive grants and deductible contributions without having their own 501(c)(3) status. Check the fiscal sponsor’s articles/bylaws (consistency with grant purposes). Review the fiscal sponsorship agreement (variance powers in Model C). fiscal sponsorship fees). In a Pre-Approved Grant Relationship Sponsorship, the fiscally-sponsored project does not become a program belonging to the sponsor, but is a separate entity responsible for managing its own tax reporting and liability issues. 1 This is a limited, short form for basic Model C “re-grant” sponsorships. This model of fiscal sponsorship is particularly valuable when a project has employees. In this fiscal sponsorship model, the sponsor would retain control of the donations and would disburse funds only when donations were collected. set forth herein. The sponsor simply assures that the project will use the grant funds received to accomplish the ends described in the grant proposal. Frances Phillips (Walter and Elise Haas Fund), Melanie Beene (consultant, former CEO of Community Initiatives), and Ian David Moss (Fractured Atlas) were my co-panelists, and we were joined by a very vocal group of attendees who made the session one of my favorites. Check the fiscal sponsor’s financials (e.g., negative unrestricted net assets). %���� An alternative to forming an independent charity. Best option for? These relationships are cogently described in Greg Colvin’s seminal book, Fiscal Sponsorship: Six Ways to Do It Right. Pre-approved Grant Relationship Fiscal Sponsorship (Grantee model) Under this relationship, your organization is a “grantee.” The sponsor is responsible for establishing a restricted fund that will receive and hold all donations made to your organization. %PDF-1.4 Model C (Pre-Approved Grant) is a grantor-grantee relationship between the sponsor and the project. Having a charitable project fiscally sponsored by a sound and reputable fiscal sponsor may be an attractive alternative to starting a nonprofit, especially when: Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window), National Network of Fiscal Sponsors – Hot Topic Call: Legal, Fiscal Sponsorship: A Valuable Option for Grantmakers and Grantees, Nonprofit Leaders Call for COVID-19 Relief Deal, Nonprofit Strategic Governance: Guest Lecture 2020, Project is housed in separate legal entity, To sponsor for purposes of the project (housed in sponsor), To sponsor for purposes of the project; sponsor may, but is not required to, regrant to project (sub-grantee). The project leaders are inexperienced or otherwise not well prepared to manage the administrative needs of a charity. The two most common models of fiscal sponsorship are referred to as comprehensive (Model A) and the pre-approved grant relationship (Model C). Carefully vet the fiscal sponsor (your grantee), not just the project leaders. The project owner, however, would own the result. Sending grants to Model A project leaders instead of the fiscal sponsor. Comparing a new 501(c)(3) with a Project or Pre-Approved Grant F iscal Sponsorship . Yesterday, I had the honor of participating on a panel discussing fiscal sponsorship at the 2014 Grantmakers in the Arts 2014 Conference in Houston. The nonprofit then releases … These relationships can help facilitate grantmakers’ support of worthy arts projects that are not suited for independent legal existence as public charities. This Agreement shall not be deemed to create any relationship of agency, partnership, or joint venture between the parties hereto, and Grantee shall make no such representation to anyone. Donations for the purposes of the project are given to the nonprofit. This includes the one-time arrangement enabling a project to obtain the proceeds of a grant from a private foundation via a sponsor, as well as the ongoing arrangement This is the model of fiscal sponsorship primarily utilized in the arts. 2 0 obj <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ExtGState<>>> endobj 3 0 obj <>stream The National Network of Fiscal Sponsors (NNFS) provides the following definitions: Comprehensive In that case, you’ll be entering into a pre-approved grant relationship. For exemplars of Model A … The following post is from a handout we distributed at the session. The most widely used models of fiscal sponsorship for charitable projects are: 1. The two most common models of fiscal sponsorship are referred to as comprehensive (Model A) and the pre-approved grant relationship (Model C). Granting to a fiscal sponsor that acts as a mere conduit to another entity. This model is most commonly used by 501(c)(3) … The National Network of Fiscal Sponsors (NNFS) provides the following definitions: In a Comprehensive Fiscal Sponsorship relationship, the fiscally-sponsored project becomes a program of the fiscal sponsor, and is a fully integrated part of the fiscal sponsor that maintains all legal and fiduciary responsibility for the sponsored project, including its employees and activities. Placing too much weight on overhead (incl. hތYM����ﯘC���00�O�%�R9H�I�J�����+����$${���+�1����ף�?~��qx�����ݎ��횧X�g�؟DT�q��8��;?E���FQ$خƧ��S�̟�f���s\���=��)G��7���u��(,x�����_E�8���0���B ��m�㬌C|�U7JɆSնl�������*�L�U�X���^6��=HнR����c��{zͪ�� O�IƏ� ?m�0����ֆ5��,yLH�&zg��_�u?u���"���M�'ձ���O�y��$�H�,\�\�H���;{F5�#���-k�^� �Y&2��}�h6\d7��퐢�Ԩ�ͲV�< �8��I��E�]�K�5����W_"����Fw�,��,���m�y^�T42�:�߇���G��W$ϋbQ&� ��8� �7!/IA�K��l��`f��L5Ԃ-��;L��Ȅ�e�C��y�����. The project and/or funding is time sensitive. As you might expect, the key relationship is between the grantor and the grantee. In addition, the sponsor does not necessarily maintain ownership of any part of the results of the project’s work—ownership rights may be addressed in the fiscal sponsor agreement and could potentially result in some form of joint ownership. New 501(c)(3) Corporation Project Conducted Within Fiscal Sponsor (Model A) Project Receives Grants From Fiscal Sponsor (Model C) 1. The term fiscal sponsorship broadly refers to a number of contractual relationships that allow a person, group, or business to advance charitable or other exempt activities with the benefit of the tax-exempt status of a sponsor organization. Pre-Approved Grant Relationship Fiscal Sponsorship (Model C) In this model, the project operates independently from the nonprofit that is fiscally sponsoring it. … The sponsor will then make grants to your organization, the “grantee”, out of this restricted fund. Directing a grant to the project in a Model C fiscal sponsorship.